Frequently Asked Questions

MFH regularly looks for ways to listen to and learn from communities across the state. Through this poll, we aim to better understand priorities and attitudes of Missourians on a range of important issues that affect their health and their lives. We will continue to poll Missourians periodically to ensure that our work reflects the issues that are important to them.

Residential street addresses across Missouri were randomly sampled, and then matched for available contact information (landline and wireless phones, as well as email addresses) from a variety of public and private databases. Potential respondents were then contacted by phone calls, text messages, and emails to invite their participation in the survey. 1,519 interviews were conducted in counties served by Missouri Foundation for Health, and another 200 in the remainder of the state. Data were statistically weighted to reflect the true geographic distribution of Missouri’s adult residents. Feedback was also gathered from Missourians through pre-poll focus groups and via QualBoard, an online software platform designed to help conduct research to understand people’s opinions, experiences, and motivations.

The poll was conducted with adult residents across the entire state of Missouri.

The interviews with Missourians took place from March 2-18, 2024. Each interview took about 23 minutes to complete.

The survey was designed and conducted by a bipartisan research team from FM3 Research (D) and New Bridge Strategy (R).

The survey was conducted in English and Spanish. Bilingual interviewers were focused on communities with large numbers of Spanish-speaking Missourians and were also assigned to re-contact respondents who were initially reached by an English-speaking interviewer.

Demographic and geographic quotas were set, based on data from the US Census, to ensure that the population of survey respondents matched the demographic characteristics of Missouri adults. The data were statistically weighted to adjust for any remaining differences.

Because respondents were contacted on mobile phones, it was possible to reach and incorporate the opinions of residents who are unstably housed.

Interviews were conducted on wireless phones as well as on landlines; in fact, more than four in five phone interviews were obtained on wireless phones. Nonetheless, response rates to telephone surveys have steadily fallen over the years; for that reason, the survey was also offered online to accommodate Missourians who prefer to respond in that way. Roughly half of responses were obtained from Missourians who replied to an email or text invitation and chose to fill out the survey online.

Oversampling entails intentionally conducting additional interviews with demographic or geographic subgroups that may be too small to be adequately analyzed as part of a general, random sample of the whole population. Once interviews are complete, the data is statistically weighted to reflect the true demographic and geographic profile of the overall population, but researchers can still analyze the responses of oversampled subgroups with confidence that the additional interviews yield greater precision in the understanding of their responses.

The survey employed proven techniques for sampling, question design, and analysis that are widely accepted within the industry. Surveys using these techniques have been shown (for example, by comparing their findings with election results) to be accurate representations of public opinion.

Every poll, no matter how well-designed, is subject to a wide range of types of error and bias that can impact the results. Sampling error relates to the specific set of individuals who are selected to participate in a poll, who may or may not perfectly mirror the opinions of the population from which they are drawn (see the discussion of the margin of error below). Different survey firms use different procedures or question wording that can affect the results, a source of error often referred to as “house effects.” Certain kinds of respondents may be less likely to be sampled or respond to some surveys, a factor known as “non-response bias.” Respondents might not be candid about controversial opinions when talking to an interviewer or might answer in ways that reflect how they believe they should think or act, rather than how they do (such as claiming to be registered to vote when they are not), a phenomenon known as “social desirability bias.” Finally, it is important to remember than any poll is a snapshot of a moment in time – public opinion can and does change, and it is not uncommon for public opinion to evolve after a poll is completed.

While there have been examples in recent years of polling in a number of states that failed to accurately model subsequent election results, the great majority of national and state polling continues to have an excellent track record of accuracy.

Yes, the survey includes data reports that break out the responses to all questions by a variety of demographic and geographic subgroups. However, limitations of sample size make it impossible to examine results within small geographic sub-units, like individual counties.

This term refers to a survey’s “margin of sampling error,” which quantifies the size of the difference in responses likely to come from interviewing a random sample of the population, rather than all of its members. In the case of this survey, we have a margin of sampling error of +/- 2.4% at the 95% confidence level. This means that 95 out of every 100 random samples are expected to produce results that come within 2.4% of the results we would obtain if we interviewed every Missouri adult. The margin of sampling error varies based on the number of respondents to a particular question (the smaller the number, the higher the margin of error) and also by the results of the question (questions with a 50/50 response have a higher margin of error than, for example, those with an 80/20 response). The 2.4% margin of error we report here reflects the most conservative estimate of the potential sampling error for the full sample.

Raw data, including all poll questions, results, and crosstabs, can be found here.